When running benchmarks with profilers and trying to
compare one run against another, it is very useful to be
able to force each run to execute exactly the same number
of iterations.
Discussion on the proposal issue #24735 led to the decision
to overload -benchtime, so that instead of saying
-benchtime 10s to run a benchmark for 10 seconds,
you say -benchtime 100x to run a benchmark 100 times.
Fixes#24735.
Change-Id: Id17c5bd18bd09987bb48ed12420d61ae9e200fd7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/139258
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Austin Clements <austin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
If the test has already completed when a go routine with a panic
handler reports an error the location of the error call is lost.
Added logDepth to be able to log location of failure at different
depths down the stack.
Fixes#26720
Change-Id: I8b7789ddae757ef6f4bd315cb20356709f4fadec
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/127596
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
I omitted vendor directories and anything necessary for bootstrapping.
(Tested by bootstrapping with Go 1.4)
Updates #27864
Change-Id: I7d9b68d0372d3a34dee22966cca323513ece7e8a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/137856
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Don’t panic if a subtest inadvertently calls FailNow
on a parent’s T. Instead, report the offending subtest
while still reporting the error with the ancestor test and
keep exiting goroutines.
Note that this implementation has a race if parallel
subtests are failing the parent concurrently.
This is fine:
Calling FailNow on a parent is considered an error
in principle, at the moment, and is reported if it is
detected. Having the race allows the race detector
to detect the error as well.
Fixes#22882
Change-Id: Ifa6d5e55bb88f6bcbb562fc8c99f1f77e320015a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/97635
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Kunpei Sakai <namusyaka@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If the only way the user indicates they want alloc stats shown
is via ReportAllocs, we don't know that until benchFunc is run.
Therefore, StopTimer's ReadMemStats will return incorrect data
for single cycle runs since there's no counterpart ReadMemStats from
StartTimer that initializes alloc stats.
It appears that this bug was introduced by CL 46612,
"testing: only call ReadMemStats if necessary when benchmarking"
Fixes#20590
Change-Id: I3b5ef91677823f4b98011880a3be15423baf7e33
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46612
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
If you have BenchmarkX1 with sub-benchmark Y
and you have BenchmarkX2 with no sub-benchmarks,
then
go test -bench=X/Y
runs BenchmarkX1 once with b.N=1 (to find out about Y)
and then not again, because it has sub-benchmarks,
but arguably also because we're interested in Y.
In contrast, it runs BenchmarkX2 in full, even though clearly
that is not relevant to the match X/Y. We do have to run X2
once with b.N=1 to probe for having X2/Y, but we should not
run it with larger b.N.
Fixes#20589.
Change-Id: Ib86907e844f34dcaac6cd05757f57db1019201d0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/46031
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
The run1 call removed in golang.org/cl/36990 was necessary to
initialize the duration of the benchmark. With it gone, the math in
launch() starts from 100. This doesn't work out well for second-long
benchmark methods. Put it back.
Updates #18815
Change-Id: I461f3466c805d0c61124a2974662f7ad45335794
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/37530
Run-TryBot: Heschi Kreinick <heschi@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
When running benchmarks with -cpuprofile,
the entire process gets profiled,
and ReadMemStats is surprisingly expensive.
Running the sort benchmarks right now with
-cpuprofile shows almost half of all execution
time in ReadMemStats.
Since ReadMemStats is not required if the benchmark
does not need allocation stats, simply skip it.
This will make cpu profiles nicer to read
and significantly speed up the process of running benchmarks.
It might also make sense to toggle cpu profiling
on/off as we begin/end individual benchmarks,
but that wouldn't get us the time savings of
skipping ReadMemStats, so this CL is useful in itself.
Change-Id: I425197b1ee11be4bc91d22b929e2caf648ebd7c5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/36791
Run-TryBot: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Prior to this change it was possible to see interleaved messages:
<<<
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName48
=== RUN Test/LongLon=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName50
gLongLongName49
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName51
>>>
This change fixes it such that you see:
<<<
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName48
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName49
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName50
=== RUN Test/LongLongLongLongName51
>>>
Fixes#18741
Change-Id: I2529d724065dc65b3e9eb3d7cbeeda82a2d0cfd4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/35556
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I429637ca91f7db4144f17621de851a548dc1ce76
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34923
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Martí <mvdan@mvdan.cc>
Run-TryBot: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
From the doc comment:
Context returns the context for the current test or benchmark.
The context is cancelled when the test or benchmark finishes.
A goroutine started during a test or benchmark can wait for the
context's Done channel to become readable as a signal that the
test or benchmark is over, so that the goroutine can exit.
Fixes#16221.
Fixes#17552.
Change-Id: I657df946be2c90048cc74615436c77c7d9d1226c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31724
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
The synchronization in this test is a bit complicated and likely
incorrect, judging from the sporadically hanging trybots.
Most of what this is supposed to test is already tested in
TestTestContext, so I'll just remove it.
Fixes#15170
Change-Id: If54db977503caa109cec4516974eda9191051888
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/22080
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
This introduces a few changes
- Skipped benchmarks now print a SKIP line, also if there was
no output
- The benchmark name is only printed if there the benchmark
was not skipped or did not fail in the probe phase.
It also fixes a bug of doubling a skip message in chatty mode in
absense of a failure.
The chatty flag is now passed in the common struct to allow
for testing of the printed messages.
Fixes#14799
Change-Id: Ia8eb140c2e5bb467e66b8ef20a2f98f5d95415d5
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21504
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
by only testing the lower bound of memalloc
Fixes#15063
Change-Id: Iab2fdd75e9ce98c641bfbce57f142fa47176772d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21507
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
Change control flow to probe with N=1. This calls benchFunc
the same number of times as the old implementation in the
absence of subbenchmarks.
To be compatible with existing tools, benchmarking only
prints a line for "leaf" benchmarks. This means, though, that
the name of a benchmark can only be printed after the first
iteration.
Issue #14863
Change-Id: Ic7b9b89b058f8ebb5287755f24f9e47df8c9537c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/21043
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The matcher is responsible for sanitizing and uniquing the
test and benchmark names and thus needs to be included before the
API can be exposed.
Matching currently uses the regexp to only match the top-level
tests/benchmarks.
Support for subtest matching is for another CL.
Change-Id: I7c8464068faef7ebc179b03a7fe3d01122cc4f0b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18897
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Marcel van Lohuizen <mpvl@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Fixed bug that slipped probably slipped in after rebasing and
explain why it failed on nacl/netbsd/plan9, which set default
maxparallelism to 1.
Change-Id: I4d59682fb2843d138b320334189f53fcdda5b2f6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20980
Run-TryBot: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
plan9, nacl, and netbsd to be precise.
Only the first test causes a hang, but just to be sure.
Change-Id: I400bb356ee2a0cf12c8666c95af79c924d1629aa
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20839
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
API is not exposed yet.
Change-Id: I729360ef2be1d8ea683ca93cdb1763897cc8657c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18895
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
The biggest change is that each test is now responsible for managing
the starting and stopping of its parallel subtests.
The "Main" test could be run as a tRunner as well. This shows that
the introduction of subtests is merely a generalization of and
consistent with the current semantics.
Change-Id: Ibf8388c08f85d4b2c0df69c069326762ed36a72e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/18893
Reviewed-by: Russ Cox <rsc@golang.org>
