This patch revives the testing.Coverage() function, which takes a
snapshot of the coverage counters within an executing "go test -cover"
test binary and returns a percentage approximating the percent of
statements covered so far.
Fixes#59590.
Change-Id: I541d47a42d71c8fb2edc473d86c8951fa80f4ab0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/495450
Reviewed-by: Michael Knyszek <mknyszek@google.com>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
If GOEXPERIMENT=coverageredesign is in effect, introduce a new
top-level '-cover' option to "go build" to turn on new-style hybrid
code coverage instrumentation. Similarly, use the new instrumentation
for "go test -cover".
The main effects of "-cover" under the hood are to instrument files at
the package level using cmd/cover and to pass additional options to
the compiler when building instrumented packages.
The previous workflow for "go tool -cover mypkg" would expand to a
series of "go tool cover" commands (one per file) followed by a single
package compilation command to build the rewritten sources.
With the new workflow, the Go command will pass all of the Go files in
a package to the cover tool as a chunk (along with a config file
containing other parameters), then the cover tool will write
instrumented versions of the sources along with another "output"
config with info on coverage variable names for the the compiler. The
Go command will then kick off the compiler on the modified source
files, also passing in the config file generated by cmd/cover.
Updates #51430.
Change-Id: Id65621ff6a8c70a30168c1412c2d6f805ff3b9e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/355452
TryBot-Result: Gopher Robot <gobot@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Than McIntosh <thanm@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Bryan Mills <bcmills@google.com>
The previous CL (https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/96756)
added comments that didn't really say much, but there is something
so say: what the units are and that they are indexed starting at 1.
Add a more helpful comment on the type, and also follow proper
style by using initial capitals and a period.
Change-Id: Id19cd5f392faf7c7bac034073f276cc770589075
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/121875
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Fill in the missing descriptions for the CoverBlock struct fields
Change-Id: I9257881a19b01e5cfe61cf19a91375b6d7cc68ef
GitHub-Last-Rev: f5b9e1d49d1c00f59ce4d3684915e5e93ec0297a
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#24079
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/96756
Reviewed-by: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Andrew Bonventre <andybons@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
For -mode=atomic, we need to read the counters
using an atomic load to avoid a race. Not worth worrying
about when -mode=atomic is set during generation
of the profile, so we use atomic loads always.
Fixes#8630.
LGTM=rsc
R=dvyukov, rsc
CC=golang-codereviews
https://golang.org/cl/141800043
