Sets Content-Length:0 for nil bodies in PATCH requests, as we already do for POST and PUT requests.
RFC 2616 mentions that unless a method’s Content-Length is forbidden it can send one.
In the wild, we’ve found that Microsoft Azure’s DataLake Gen2 storage API https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/rest/api/storageservices/datalakestoragegen2/path/update deliberately rejects PATCH requests without a Content-Length, yet there is no workaround for setting that header when trying to flush the content of a file which was uploaded in a previous request.
Fixes#40978
Change-Id: Ib0a623b907d827a1c5ee431dca3c41024fa291c5
GitHub-Last-Rev: 12a3903f2bc22bcc4f5f8e2abcc3922b612b8871
GitHub-Pull-Request: golang/go#40991
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/go/+/250039
Run-TryBot: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Emmanuel Odeke <emm.odeke@gmail.com>
This is a more conservative version of the reverted CL 99135 (which
was reverted in CL 137716)
The net/url part rejects URLs with ASCII CTLs from being parsed and
the net/http part rejects writing them if a bogus url.URL is
constructed otherwise.
Updates #27302
Updates #22907
Change-Id: I09a2212eb74c63db575223277aec363c55421ed8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/c/159157
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Filippo Valsorda <filippo@golang.org>
This reverts commit 08f19bbde1b01227fdc2fa2d326e4029bb74dd96.
Reason for revert:
The changed transformation takes effect on a larger set
of code snippets than expected.
For example, this:
func foo() {
// Comment
bar()
}
becomes:
func foo() {
// Comment
bar()
}
This is an unintended consequence.
Change-Id: Ifca88d6267dab8a8170791f7205124712bf8ace8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/81335
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <joetsai@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
To improve readability when exported fields are removed,
forbid the printer from emitting an empty line before the first comment
in a const, var, or type block.
Also, when printing the "Has filtered or unexported fields." message,
add an empty line before it to separate the message from the struct
or interfact contents.
Before the change:
<<<
type NamedArg struct {
// Name is the name of the parameter placeholder.
//
// If empty, the ordinal position in the argument list will be
// used.
//
// Name must omit any symbol prefix.
Name string
// Value is the value of the parameter.
// It may be assigned the same value types as the query
// arguments.
Value interface{}
// contains filtered or unexported fields
}
>>>
After the change:
<<<
type NamedArg struct {
// Name is the name of the parameter placeholder.
//
// If empty, the ordinal position in the argument list will be
// used.
//
// Name must omit any symbol prefix.
Name string
// Value is the value of the parameter.
// It may be assigned the same value types as the query
// arguments.
Value interface{}
// contains filtered or unexported fields
}
>>>
Fixes#18264
Change-Id: I9fe17ca39cf92fcdfea55064bd2eaa784ce48c88
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/71990
Run-TryBot: Joe Tsai <thebrokentoaster@gmail.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Robert Griesemer <gri@golang.org>
In Go 1.8, we'd removed the Transport's Request.Body
one-byte-Read-sniffing to disambiguate between non-nil Request.Body
with a ContentLength of 0 or -1. Previously, we tried to see whether a
ContentLength of 0 meant actually zero, or just an unset by reading a
single byte of the Request.Body and then stitching any read byte back
together with the original Request.Body.
That historically has caused many problems due to either data races,
blocking forever (#17480), or losing bytes (#17071). Thus, we removed
it in both HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 in Go 1.8. Unfortunately, during the Go
1.8 beta, we've found that a few people have gotten bitten by the
behavior change on requests with methods typically not containing
request bodies (e.g. GET, HEAD, DELETE). The most popular example is
the aws-go SDK, which always set http.Request.Body to a non-nil value,
even on such request methods. That was causing Go 1.8 to send such
requests with Transfer-Encoding chunked bodies, with zero bytes,
confusing popular servers (including but limited to AWS).
This CL partially reverts the no-byte-sniffing behavior and restores
it only for GET/HEAD/DELETE/etc requests, and only when there's no
Transfer-Encoding set, and the Content-Length is 0 or -1.
Updates #18257 (aws-go) bug
And also private bug reports about non-AWS issues.
Updates #18407 also, but haven't yet audited things enough to declare
it fixed.
Change-Id: Ie5284d3e067c181839b31faf637eee56e5738a6a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/34668
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The introduction of NoBody and related body-peeking bug fixes also
added a "cleanup" of sorts to make NewRequest set the returned
Requests's ContentLength to -1 when it didn't know it.
Using -1 to mean unknown is what the documentation says, but then
people apparently(?) depended on it being zero so they could do this:
req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", url, someNonNilReaderWithUnkownSize)
req.Body = nil
res, err := http.DefaultClient.Do(req)
... and expect it to work.
After https://golang.org/cl/31445 the contrived(?) code above stopped
working, since Body was nil and ContentLength was -1, which has been
disallowed since Go 1.0.
So this restores the old behavior of NewRequest, not setting it to -1.
That part of the fix isn't required as of https://golang.org/cl/31726
(which added NoBody)
I still don't know whether this bug is hypothetical or actually
affected people in practice.
Let's assume it's real for now.
Fixes#18117
Change-Id: I42400856ee92a1a4999b5b4668bef97d885fbb53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/33801
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
This CL makes NewRequest set Body nil for known-zero bodies, and makes
the http1 Transport not peek-Read a byte to determine whether there's
a body.
Background:
Many fields of the Request struct have different meanings for whether
they're outgoing (via the Transport) or incoming (via the Server).
For outgoing requests, ContentLength and Body are documented as:
// Body is the request's body.
//
// For client requests a nil body means the request has no
// body, such as a GET request. The HTTP Client's Transport
// is responsible for calling the Close method.
Body io.ReadCloser
// ContentLength records the length of the associated content.
// The value -1 indicates that the length is unknown.
// Values >= 0 indicate that the given number of bytes may
// be read from Body.
// For client requests, a value of 0 with a non-nil Body is
// also treated as unknown.
ContentLength int64
Because of the ambiguity of what ContentLength==0 means, the http1 and
http2 Transports previously Read the first byte of a non-nil Body when
the ContentLength was 0 to determine whether there was an actual body
(with a non-zero length) and ContentLength just wasn't populated, or
it was actually empty.
That byte-sniff has been problematic and gross (see #17480, #17071)
and was removed for http2 in a previous commit.
That means, however, that users doing:
req, _ := http.NewRequest("POST", url, strings.NewReader(""))
... would not send a Content-Length header in their http2 request,
because the size of the reader (even though it was known, being one of
the three common recognized types from NewRequest) was zero, and so
the HTTP Transport thought it was simply unset.
To signal explicitly-zero vs unset-zero, this CL changes NewRequest to
signal explicitly-zero by setting the Body to nil, instead of the
strings.NewReader("") or other zero-byte reader.
This CL also removes the byte sniff from the http1 Transport, like
https://golang.org/cl/31326 did for http2.
Updates #17480
Updates #17071
Change-Id: I329f02f124659bf7d8bc01e2c9951ebdd236b52a
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/31445
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
The tree's pretty inconsistent about single space vs double space
after a period in documentation. Make it consistently a single space,
per earlier decisions. This means contributors won't be confused by
misleading precedence.
This CL doesn't use go/doc to parse. It only addresses // comments.
It was generated with:
$ perl -i -npe 's,^(\s*// .+[a-z]\.) +([A-Z]),$1 $2,' $(git grep -l -E '^\s*//(.+\.) +([A-Z])')
$ go test go/doc -update
Change-Id: Iccdb99c37c797ef1f804a94b22ba5ee4b500c4f7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20022
Reviewed-by: Rob Pike <r@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Day <djd@golang.org>
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
This is a subset of https://golang.org/cl/20022 with only the copyright
header lines, so the next CL will be smaller and more reviewable.
Go policy has been single space after periods in comments for some time.
The copyright header template at:
https://golang.org/doc/contribute.html#copyright
also uses a single space.
Make them all consistent.
Change-Id: Icc26c6b8495c3820da6b171ca96a74701b4a01b0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/20111
Run-TryBot: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Dempsky <mdempsky@google.com>
TryBot-Result: Gobot Gobot <gobot@golang.org>
When making a request to an IPv6 address with a zone identifier, for
exmaple [fe80::1%en0], RFC 6874 says HTTP clients must remove the zone
identifier "%en0" before writing the request for security reason.
This change removes any IPv6 zone identifer attached to URI in the Host
header field in requests.
Fixes#9544.
Change-Id: I7406bd0aa961d260d96f1f887c2e45854e921452
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/3111
Reviewed-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@golang.org>
