cybercyst/go
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/golang/go.git synced 2025-05-05 15:43:04 +00:00
Code Issues Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Updated Go2GenericsFeedback (markdown)

李晓辉 2019-12-20 15:43:35 +08:00
parent 2a9468c526
commit 0dff66f453
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
Go2GenericsFeedback.md

@ -352,4 +352,6 @@ func main() {
- antoniomo: While the draft clearly explains why `F<T>`, `F[T]` and non-ASCII (unable to type it here) `F<<T>>` where discarded, feels like `F{T}` would be more human readable than the sometimes three in a row set of `()`, while not complicating the parser with unbounded lookahead as you can't open a block in those circumstances. - antoniomo: While the draft clearly explains why `F<T>`, `F[T]` and non-ASCII (unable to type it here) `F<<T>>` where discarded, feels like `F{T}` would be more human readable than the sometimes three in a row set of `()`, while not complicating the parser with unbounded lookahead as you can't open a block in those circumstances.
- aprice2704: I really dislike the idea of using regular parentheses `(`, would a two-character sequence cause compiler overhead from unbounded lookahead? How about <| and |> ? would they work? They have the advantages of being quite distinct from `(`, making some visual sense in ascii, and in the 'Fira Code' font (highly recommended) which I use in VSCode there are ligatures to render these as little right or left pointing triangles. - aprice2704: I really dislike the idea of using regular parentheses `(`, would a two-character sequence cause compiler overhead from unbounded lookahead? How about <| and |> ? would they work? They have the advantages of being quite distinct from `(`, making some visual sense in ascii, and in the 'Fira Code' font (highly recommended) which I use in VSCode there are ligatures to render these as little right or left pointing triangles.
- leaxoy: First I'm sorry for editing the page footer, however I can't remove footer content. This is my opinion: lots of `(` & `)` made go looks so messy, `<` & `>` like other language is better, and is more kindly for those come from other languages.