mirror of
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj.git
synced 2025-05-09 17:32:50 +00:00
files: use borrowed Merge iterator in merge()
Since the underlying Merge data type is no longer (Vec<T>, Vec<T>), it doesn't make sense to build removes/adds Vecs and concatenate them.
This commit is contained in:
parent
f344651d2c
commit
895bbce8c0
@ -516,7 +516,7 @@ pub fn edit_merge_builtin(
|
||||
content: Merge<ContentHunk>,
|
||||
) -> Result<MergedTreeId, BuiltinToolError> {
|
||||
let slices = content.map(|ContentHunk(v)| v.as_slice());
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(slices);
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(&slices);
|
||||
let sections = make_merge_sections(merge_result)?;
|
||||
let recorder = scm_record::Recorder::new(
|
||||
scm_record::RecordState {
|
||||
@ -731,7 +731,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
);
|
||||
let content = extract_as_single_hunk(&merge, store, &path).block_on();
|
||||
let slices = content.map(|ContentHunk(buf)| buf.as_slice());
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(slices);
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(&slices);
|
||||
let sections = make_merge_sections(merge_result).unwrap();
|
||||
insta::assert_debug_snapshot!(sections, @r###"
|
||||
[
|
||||
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ pub fn materialize_merge_result(
|
||||
output: &mut dyn Write,
|
||||
) -> std::io::Result<()> {
|
||||
let slices = single_hunk.map(|content| content.0.as_slice());
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(slices);
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(&slices);
|
||||
match merge_result {
|
||||
MergeResult::Resolved(content) => {
|
||||
output.write_all(&content.0)?;
|
||||
|
@ -167,14 +167,12 @@ struct SyncRegion {
|
||||
right: Range<usize>,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
pub fn merge(slices: Merge<&[u8]>) -> MergeResult {
|
||||
let (removes, adds) = slices.take();
|
||||
let num_diffs = removes.len();
|
||||
pub fn merge(slices: &Merge<&[u8]>) -> MergeResult {
|
||||
// TODO: Using the first remove as base (first in the inputs) is how it's
|
||||
// usually done for 3-way conflicts. Are there better heuristics when there are
|
||||
// more than 3 parts?
|
||||
let mut diff_inputs = removes.to_vec();
|
||||
diff_inputs.extend(adds);
|
||||
let num_diffs = slices.removes().len();
|
||||
let diff_inputs = slices.removes().chain(slices.adds()).copied().collect_vec();
|
||||
|
||||
let diff = Diff::for_tokenizer(&diff_inputs, &diff::find_line_ranges);
|
||||
let mut resolved_hunk = ContentHunk(vec![]);
|
||||
@ -226,7 +224,7 @@ mod tests {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
fn merge(removes: &[&[u8]], adds: &[&[u8]]) -> MergeResult {
|
||||
super::merge(Merge::new(removes.to_vec(), adds.to_vec()))
|
||||
super::merge(&Merge::new(removes.to_vec(), adds.to_vec()))
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#[test]
|
||||
|
@ -453,7 +453,7 @@ pub fn try_resolve_file_conflict(
|
||||
Ok(content)
|
||||
})?;
|
||||
let slices = contents.map(|content| content.as_slice());
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(slices);
|
||||
let merge_result = files::merge(&slices);
|
||||
match merge_result {
|
||||
MergeResult::Resolved(merged_content) => {
|
||||
let id = store.write_file(filename, &mut merged_content.0.as_slice())?;
|
||||
|
@ -1305,7 +1305,7 @@ fn test_merge_simplify_file_conflict() {
|
||||
],
|
||||
);
|
||||
assert!(matches!(
|
||||
jj_lib::files::merge(text_merge.flatten()),
|
||||
jj_lib::files::merge(&text_merge.flatten()),
|
||||
MergeResult::Conflict(_)
|
||||
));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user