With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
If you have multiple remotes to push to, you might want to keep some changes
(such as security patches) in your private fork. Git CLI has one upstream remote
per branch, but jj supports multiple tracking remotes, and therefore "jj git
push" can start tracking new remotes automatically.
This patch makes new bookmarks not eligible for push by default. I considered
adding a warning, but it's not always possible to interrupt the push shortly
after a warning is emitted.
--all implies --allow-new because otherwise it's equivalent to --tracked. It's
also easier to write a conflict rule with --all/--deleted/--tracked than with
two of them.
-c/--change doesn't require --allow-new because it is the flag to create new
tracking bookmark.
#1278
We had documented that we support `git.auto-local-bookmark` but we
don't. The documentation has been incorrect since d9c68e08b1a5. This
patch fixes it by adding support for `git.auto-local-bookmark` with
fallback to the old/current `git.auto-local-branch`.
.
"Bookmark changes" sounds like changes will be bookmarked, and "Bookmark" here
is redundant. If we add support for pushing tags, this message will have to be
generalized anyway.
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
The user can define the setting `git.private-commits` as they desire. For
example:
git.private-commits = 'description(glob:"wip:*")'
If any commits are in this revset, then the push is aborted.
If a commit would be private but already exists on the remote, then it does
not block pushes, nor do its descendents block pushes unless they are also
contained in `git.private-commits`.
Closes#3376
