We usually print stats at the end of mutable operation, and I think these
messages are useful even if N = 1. I understand that "Deleted N" (N > 1) is
unusual and the original intent of these messages was to signal possible
mistakes. However, I don't think printing N=1 stats would nullify the original
purpose.
No emptiness check is needed for delete/forget, but names can be empty in
track/untrack because of noop changes.
At work, a user encountered a panic upon attempting to create a dir at
the line in the diff below, but it turned out to be difficult to debug
because I didn't know what the path was. There already is a mechanism to
add path context in the lib crate; make it available in the cli crate as
well, and use the mechanism to add path context to "workspace add".
Now, the command for `jj git remote add` is `cmd_git_remote_add` and its
argument type is `GitRemoteAddArgs`. This should make it easier to find
the CLI docs and the implementation for commands.
This is how `jj branch` commands were already set up in this way. The
`jj op` commands were also already set up in this way, except the
functions are called e.g. `cmd_op_undo`, I kept this for simplicity.
I was mainly motivated by the `jj file` commands. Most other commands
had functions already named in the above pattern, but used to have
shorter argument type names.
We have two other kinds of working copies at Google and it's sometimes
useful to get the basic information about operation id and tree id for
them, for exampel for debugging stale workspaces. This patch adds a
command for that.
We could instead have made the old `jj debug working-copy` command
work for all kinds of working copies (like the new command) and only
have extra information for the standard local-disk implementation. I
don't feel strongly either way and could do it other other way instead
if people prefer that.
While explaining branch tracking behavior, I find it's bad UX that a deleted
branch can be re-"create"d with tracking state preserved. It's rather a "set"
operation. Since deleted tracking branch is still listed, I think it's better
to assume that the local branch name is reserved.
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/discussions/3871
Renaming to deleted tracking branch is still allowed (with warning) because the
"rename" command can't handle tracked remotes very well. If it were banned, bad
rename couldn't be reverted by using "jj branch rename". It would be confusing
if "rename a b" succeeded with warning, but the following "rename b a" failed.
This will help inline view.remove_branch() in cmd_branch_forget(). I don't
care much about owned (String, _) vs (&str, _), but we can't simplify the
lifetime issue in find_forgettable_branches() anyway. So I made all callers
pass cloned Arc<ReadonlyRepo> and borrow (name, target) pairs from there.
We now have two `cmd_show` in the repo. I think this one should become
`cmd_file_show`, but this should be done uniformly over all the commands
for consistency.
I did *not* keep `print` as an alias (I couldn't find a compelling
reason to do it), but let me know if anyone feels like keeping it.
Since "set <thing>" often adds a <thing> if not exists, it make some sense
that "branch set" does upsert. The current "branch set" use case is now covered
by "branch move", so it's okay to change the "set" behavior.
If new branch is created by "branch set", status message and hint will be
printed to help migration. The user should be able to undo creation if it was
a mistake.
Closes#3584
This allows users to jump to the next conflict in the ancestors or children of
the start commit.
Continues work on #2126
Co-Authored-By: Noah Mayr <dev@noahmayr.com>
This allows users to easily filter a commit range by conflicts, which will be needed for `next/prev`
further down in the next commit. Users which benefit from it were also migrated.
In a repo of mine I wanted to do something like the following to push all of my
leaves to the remote as backup:
jj git push -c 'all:heads(base::) & mine() ~ empty()'
But couldn't, because `jj git push` doesn't handle large revsets, even though
it does handle multiple `-c` arguments, so I had to work out some pipe-to-xargs
command instead.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
The follow up diff will make `-c` accept large revsets, so it won't make any
sense to print out the original expression when multiple branches will be
created from it.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
This is another big subcommand module. Let's split it up.
I'm not a big fan of r#move syntax, but we already have one in src/commands,
so there's no point to avoid it.
