When there's a single parent, we can determine if a commit is empty by
just comparing the tree ids. Also, when using tree-level conflicts, we
don't need to read the trees to determine if there's a conflict. This
patch adds both of those fast paths, speeding up `jj log -r ::main`
from 317 ms to 227 ms (-28.4%). It has much larger impact with our
cloud-based backend at Google (~5x faster).
I made the same fix in the revset engine and the Git push code (thanks
to Yuya for the suggestion).
The `--allow-large-revsets` flag we have on `jj rebase` and `jj new`
allows the user to do e.g. `jj rebase --allow-large-revsets -b
main.. -d main` to rebase all commits that are not in main onto
main. The reason we don't allow these revsets to resolve to multiple
commits by default is that we think users might specify multiple
commits by mistake. That's probably not much of a problem with `jj
rebase -b` (maybe we should always allow that to resolve to multiple
commits), but the user might want to know if `jj rebase -d @-`
resolves to multiple commits.
One problem with having a flag to allow multiple commits is that it
needs to be added to every command where we want to allow multiple
commits but default to one. Also, it should probably apply to each
revset argument those commands take. For example, even if the user
meant `-b main..` to resolve to multiple commits, they might not have
meant `-d main` to resolve to multiple commits (which it will in case
of a conflicted branch), so we might want separate
`--allow-large-revsets-in-destination` and
`--allow-large-revsets-in-source`, which gets quite cumbersome. It
seems better to have some syntax in the individual revsets for saying
that multiple commits are allowed.
One proposal I had was to use a `multiple()` revset function which
would have no effect in general but would be used as a marker if used
at the top level (e.g. `jj rebase -d 'multiple(@-)'`). After some
discussion on the PR adding that function (#1911), it seems that the
consensus is to instead use a prefix like `many:` or `all:`. That
avoids the problem with having a function that has no effect unless
it's used at the top level (`jj rebase -d 'multiple(x)|y'` would have
no effect).
Since we already have the `:` operator for DAG ranges, we need to
change it to make room for `many:`/`all:` syntax. This commit starts
that by allowing both `:` and `::`.
I have tried to update the documentation in this commit to either
mention both forms, or just the new and preferred `::` form. However,
it's useless to search for `:` in Rust code, so I'm sure I've missed
many instances. We'll have to address those as we notice them. I'll
let most tests use `:` until we deprecate it or delete it.
This partially reverts 4c8f484278de "graphlog: key by commit id (not index
position)." As Martin pointed out, it made "log -r 'tags()' -T.." in git
repo super slow. Apparently, both clone() and hash map insertion/lookup costs
increased by that change. Since we don't need CommitId inside the graph
iterator, we can simply replace it with IndexPosition, and resolve it to
CommitId later.
`MergedTree` is now ready to be used when checking if a commit has
conflicts, and when listing conflicts. We don't yet a way for the user
to say they want to use tree-level conflicts even for these
cases. However, since the backend can decide, we should be able to
have our backend return tree-level conflicts. All writes will still
use path-level conflicts, so the experimentation we can do at Google
is limited.
Beacause `MergedTree` doesn't yet have a way of walking conflicts
while restricting it by a matcher, this will make `jj resolve` a
little slower. I suspect no one will notice.
This eliminates indirect access through Vec<u8> and improves cache locality
while sorting the index entries. We can achieve a similar result by using
SmallVec<[u8; 24]> in place of Commit/ChangeId(Vec<u8>), but we would have
to determine a reasonable id length across backends. Indexing [u8; 4] performs
better, at the cost of the API and implementation complexity.
For temporary Commit/ChangeId allocation in general, I think a borrowed type
like Path/PathBuf will help.
Testing with my "linux" repo, this saves ~670ms needed to initialize both
change id index and disambiguation indexes.
It allows us to build multiple IdIndex instances within a single loop. As the
final sorting is heavy operation, I don't want to implement Default + Extend
for IdIndex to be compatible with Iterator::unzip().
This gets rid of round-trip conversion from queries like "(main..)-". I have
such expression in my default log/disambiguation revset, and the query could
take ~150ms to convert head positions back and forth if the repository had
tons of unmerged commits.
I'm going to add a RevWalk method to walk descendants with generation filter,
which will use this helper method. RevWalk::take_until_roots() uses .min()
instead of .last() since RevWalk shouldn't know the order of the input set.
The substitution rule and tests are copied from ancestors/parents. The backend
logic will be reimplemented later. For now, it naively repeats children().
This is a minimal change to replace Children with Descendants. A generation
parameter could be added to RevsetExpression::DagRange, but it's not needed
as of now.
I'm going to add generation parameter to Children/DagRange nodes, and
'Children { .. }' will be substituted to 'DagRange { .., gen: 1 }'. This
commit helps future code move.
Lifetime bounds of the arguments are unnecessarily restricted. It appears
walk_ancestors_until_roots() captures arguments lifetime on rustc 1.64.0.
I think the problem will go away if walk_*() functions are extracted to
RevWalk methods where input arguments will become less generic.
It doesn't matter, but can simplify the function interface. I'll probably
extract this function to RevWalk so the descendants with/without generation
filter can be tested without using revset API.
It no longer needs to be on the `Index` trait, thereby removing the
last direct use of `IndexEntry` in the trait (it's still used
indirectly in `walk_revs()`).
A chain of 4 billion commits is a lot, but it's not out of the
question, so let's support it. The current default index will not be
able to handle that many commits, so I let that still use 32-bit
integers.
New ResolvedExpression enum ensures that the evaluation engine doesn't have
to know the symbol resolution details. In this commit, I've moved Filter
and NotIn resolution to resolve_visibility(). Implicit All/VisibleHeads
resolution will be migrated later.
It's tempting to combine resolve_symbols() and resolve_visibility() to get
rid of panic!()s, but the resolution might have to be two passes to first
resolve&collect explicit commit ids, and then substitute "all()" with
"(:visible_heads())|commit_id|..". It's also possible to apply some tree
transformation after symbol resolution.
This makes it clear what should be resolved at resolve_symbols(). Symbol
is a bit special while parsing function arguments, but it's no different
than the other unresolved references at expression level.
I'm thinking of transforming RevsetExpression to a enum dedicated for
the evaluation stage. To help the migration, I want to remove the use of
the RevsetExpression builder API from the evaluation engine.
Fewer virtual dispatch is also better.
The `heads()` revset function with one argument is the counterpart to
`roots()`. Without arguments, it returns the visible heads in the
repo, i.e. `heads(all())`. The two use cases are quite different, and
I think it would be good to clarify that the no-arg form returns the
visible heads, so let's split that out to a new `visible_heads()`
function.
This basically removes hidden 'all() &' from union/negation of filters. To
achieve that, I have two options: 1. add separate evaluation path (like the
one this commit introduced), or 2. wrap "all()" revset to override predicate
as Box::new(|_| true) function. I took the former since it's less ad-hoc.
We can add an explicit RevsetExpression node to branch between evaluate()
and evaluate_predicate(), but I don't think it would simplify the
implementation at this point. We might need such node if we want to resolve
"all()" at resolve_symbols(). It might be even better to extract a subset of
RevsetExpression enum, which only contains evaluatable nodes.
The cost of 'all() &' isn't significant for most filters. '~merges()' is
the exception. For jj repo,
revsets/:v0.3.0 & (author(martinvonz) | committer(martinvonz))
--------------------------------------------------------------
base 1.06 11.2±0.04m
new 1.00 10.5±0.05m
revsets/~merges()
-----------------
base 1.69 750.0±8.47µ
new 1.00 444.1±3.50µ
I think this is more readable, and apparently it produces slightly better code
maybe because the compiler can determine that there are no unwanted markers.
