Since RefTarget will be reimplemented on top of Conflict<Option<CommitId>>,
we won't be able to simply return a slice of type &[CommitId]. These functions
are also renamed in order to disambiguate from Conflict::adds()/removes().
.unwrap() calls will be removed if we migrate RefTarget to new Conflict-based
type. Some of them were previously .unwrap_or_default(), but they would panic
anyway inside ref_target_from_proto().
is_none()/is_some() are wrapped as is_absent()/is_present() respectively.
If we see new RefTarget as a Conflict, an "absent" target isn't an emptyish
value like None, but an add of single [None]. It seemed a bit weird to call
such target is_none().
RefTarget type will be a wrapper around Conflict<Option<CommitId>>, and the
match arms would be more verbose. Fortunately, new code looks simpler since
we can merge non-conflicting cases.
It's named after Conflict::from_legacy_form(). If RefTarget is migrated to
new Conflict type, from_legacy_form([], [add]) will create a normal target,
and from_legacy_form([], []) will be equivalent to the current None target.
That's why this function isn't named as RefTarget::conflict().
If RefTarget is migrated to new Conflict type, this function will create
RefTarget(Conflict::resolved(Some(id))).
We still need some .unwrap() to insert Option<RefTarget> into map, but maps
will be changed to store new RefTarget type, and their mutation API will
guarantee that Conflict::resolved(None) is eliminated.
Perhaps, all view.get_<kind>(name) functions can return reference, but I'm
not willing to change the interface at this point. I'll revisit this after
migrating Option<RefTarget> to new Conflict-based type.
If we migrate RefTarget to new Conflict-based type, it won't store
Conflict<CommitId>, but Conflict<Option<CommitId>>. As the Option will
be internalized, new RefTarget type will also represent an absent target.
The 'target: Option<RefTarget>' argument will be replaced with new RefTarget
type.
I've also renamed the function for consistency with the following changes.
It would be surprising if set_local_branch(name, target) could remove the
branch. I feel the name set_local_branch_target() is less confusing.
This might look more complicated than the original code, but it clarifies
that we always eliminate a (remove, add) pair. The behavior slightly changed
since an absent ref (i.e. None) in "removes" can now be paired with an "add"
even if "removes" contained other ids. Before, it was possible only when
removes.is_empty().
The order of conflicted ids slightly changed since Conflict::simplify()
tries to preserve diff pairs. It shouldn't matter so long as the result is
stable.
Git CLI rejects it (though the data model would probably work fine with
"HEAD" branch.) This ensures that HEAD@git in JJ world is not an exported
branch named "HEAD".
This is (almost) a result of running
cargo +nightly clippy --workspace --all-targets --fix \
-- -A 'clippy::needless_raw_string_hashes'
with yesterday's nightly clippy.
https://github.com/mitsuhiko/insta/issues/389 causes numerous additional
`needless_raw_string_hashes` warnings, but it will hopefully be fixed soon.
For now, I recommend appending the second line to your invocations.
This will help to rewrite refs::merge_ref_targets() to leverage Conflict
type. I'm not pretty sure if we'll want to do that, but this change seems
also good for the existing code.
It seemed too verbose to always include @remote branches, so synced remotes
are omitted by default. If the given symbol contained '@', all remote symbols
are populated so that the distance of remote fragment is taken into account.
