I'm going to add "[EOF]" marker to test that command output is terminated by
newline char. This patch ensures that callers who expect a raw output string
would never be affected by any normalization passes.
Some common normalization functions are extracted as CommandOutputString
methods.
Although this behaviour is accepted by git, it's a degenerate case.
Especially because we implicitely rely on being able to parse out the
remote from the refname (i.e., `refs/remotes/<remote>/<branch>`).
Branches can have forward slashes, but if remotes can also have them,
parsing the refname becomes ambiguous, and a pain. Especially because it
would be totally legal to have a branch "c" on remote "a/b" and a branch
"b" on remote "a".
Fixes#5731
Forgetting remote bookmarks can lead to surprising behavior since it
causes the repo state to become out-of-sync with the remote until the
next `jj git fetch`. Untracking the bookmarks should be a simpler and
more intuitive default behavior. The old behavior is still available
with the `--include-remotes` flag.
I also changed the displayed number of forgotten branches. Previously
when forgetting "bookmark", "bookmark@remote", and "bookmark@git" it
would display `Forgot 1 bookmarks`, but I think this would be confusing
with the new flag since the user might think that `--include-remotes`
didn't work. Now it shows separate `Forgot N local bookmarks` and
`Forgot M remote bookmarks` messages when applicable.
With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
Given the previously‐stated intention of making this default
for the 0.27 release, prepare for that decision ahead of time by
enabling subprocessing by default on trunk. This will help surface
any regressions and workflow incompatibilities and therefore give
us more information to decide whether to keep or revert this commit,
without inconveniencing any users who haven’t already opted in to
the bleeding edge.
Please feel free to revert without hesitation if any major issues
arise; this is not intended as a strong commitment to enable this
option for the next stable release if it turns out to not be ready. In
that case, it’s better that we learn that early on in the cycle,
rather than having to revert at the last minute or, worse, cutting
a stable release that we later find contains a serious regression.
Currently, the Git subprocess tests only work on Linux due to a default
path being used for the `git` executable when `$PATH` is unset. This can
break if Git isn't installed at the expected path. Also, I believe it is
currently necessary to set the `$TEST_GIT_EXECUTABLE_PATH` environment
variable on Windows for tests to pass. Instead, we should use the user's
`$PATH` to locate the `git` executable, as well as any other executables
that are needed. This also makes `$TEST_GIT_EXECUTABLE_PATH` no longer
necessary, so it can be removed.
This goes against our rule that we shouldn't add config knob that changes the
command behavior, but I don't have any other idea to work around the problem.
Apparently, there are two parties, one who always wants to push new bookmarks,
and the other who mildly prefers to push&track new bookmarks explicitly.
Perhaps, for the former, creation of bookmarks means that the target branches
are marked to be pushed.
The added flag is a simple boolean. "non-tracking-only" behavior #5173 could be
implemented, but I don't want to complicate things. It's a failed attempt to
address the issue without introducing config knob.
Closes#5094Closes#5173
Since source.contains(':') can't be used for non-local path detection on
Windows, we now use gix::url for parsing. It might be stricter, but I assume it
would be more reliable.
Closes#4188
The working-copy revision is usually the latest commit, but it's not always
true. This patch ensures that the wc branch is emitted first so the graph node
order is less dependent on rewrites.
If you have multiple remotes to push to, you might want to keep some changes
(such as security patches) in your private fork. Git CLI has one upstream remote
per branch, but jj supports multiple tracking remotes, and therefore "jj git
push" can start tracking new remotes automatically.
This patch makes new bookmarks not eligible for push by default. I considered
adding a warning, but it's not always possible to interrupt the push shortly
after a warning is emitted.
--all implies --allow-new because otherwise it's equivalent to --tracked. It's
also easier to write a conflict rule with --all/--deleted/--tracked than with
two of them.
-c/--change doesn't require --allow-new because it is the flag to create new
tracking bookmark.
#1278
We had documented that we support `git.auto-local-bookmark` but we
don't. The documentation has been incorrect since d9c68e08b1a5. This
patch fixes it by adding support for `git.auto-local-bookmark` with
fallback to the old/current `git.auto-local-branch`.
.
"Bookmark changes" sounds like changes will be bookmarked, and "Bookmark" here
is redundant. If we add support for pushing tags, this message will have to be
generalized anyway.
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
For the same reason as the previous commit.
Created and moved stats are printed separately because it's unusual to do both
within one "branch set" invocation.
It's common to create empty working-copy commits while using jj, and
currently the author timestamp for a commit is only set when it is first
created. If you create an empty commit, then don't work on a repo for a
few days, and then start working on a new feature without abandoning the
working-copy commit, the author timestamp will remain as the time the
commit was created rather than being updated to the time that work began
or finished.
This commit changes the behavior so that discardable commits (empty
commits with no description) by the current user have their author
timestamps reset when they are rewritten, meaning that the author
timestamp will become finalized whenever a commit is given a description
or becomes non-empty.
In a repo of mine I wanted to do something like the following to push all of my
leaves to the remote as backup:
jj git push -c 'all:heads(base::) & mine() ~ empty()'
But couldn't, because `jj git push` doesn't handle large revsets, even though
it does handle multiple `-c` arguments, so I had to work out some pipe-to-xargs
command instead.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
The follow up diff will make `-c` accept large revsets, so it won't make any
sense to print out the original expression when multiple branches will be
created from it.
Signed-off-by: Austin Seipp <aseipp@pobox.com>
This commit adds an optional flag to be able to push commits with an
empty description to a remote git repo. While the default behavior is
ideal we might need to interact with a repo that has an empty commit
description in it. I ran into this issue a few weeks ago pushing commits
from an open source repo to an empty repo and had to go back to using
git for that push as I would not want to rewrite the history which was
many many years long just for that.
This flag allows users an escape hatch for pushing empty descriptions
for commits and they're sure that they want that behavior.
This commit adds the flag to the `git push` command and updates the docs
for the command. It also updates the original test to make sure that the
flag works as intended to reject the commit when not set and to allow
the commit when the flag is set.
Closes#2633
As explained in the commit, our logic is a bit more complicated than
that of `git push --force-with-lease`. This is to match the behavior of
`jj git fetch` and branch conflict resolution rules.
This tests `git push` attempting to create a branch when the branch
already unexpectedly exists on the remote. This should (and does)
fail.
Also changes another test to use `jj_cmd_failure`.
When you use e.g. `git switch` to check out a conflicted commit,
you're going to end up with the `.jjconflicts-*` directories in your
working copy. It's probably not obvious what those mean. This patch
adds a README file to the root tree to try to explain to users what's
going on and how to recover.
The authoritative information about conflicts is stored in the
`jj:trees` commit header. The contents of conflicted commits is only
used for preventing GC. We can therefore add contents to the tree
without much consequence.
It's inconsistent that some warnings have headings and some don't, and it seems
the choice is arbitrary. Let's unify the style. There are two exceptions:
1. continued line following labeled message,
2. "unrecognized response" followed by prompt.
This fixes --change/--branch conflicts by making --change precede --branch. I
don't think this is the most obvious behavior, but it's the easiest workaround.
It could be moved before set_local_branch_target() to not update the local
branch, but it seemed weird that --change is silently ignored. This
inconsistency will be addressed later.
