This isn't fancy, but I couldn't find a better abstraction. Note that
MutableRepo::base_repo() isn't removed as it has to return &Arc<_>, whereas
<ReadonlyRepo as Repo>::base_repo() can't return &Arc<_>.
This removes an invalid View state from the root operation.
Note that the root index will have to be reindexed in order to resolve "root()"
in the root operation. I don't think this would practically matter, so this
patch doesn't bump the index version to invalidate the existing indexes.
See also 48a9f9ef56c1 "repo: use Transaction for creating repo-init operation."
See the next patch for why. It might look odd that OpStore depends on the root
CommitId, but that seems okay because OpStore manages Views, and a View is
basically a set of CommitIds.
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
`jj new <commit>` automatically adds the checked out commits into the view head ids. However,
`jj edit` does not.
To reproduce:
```
jj git init test
cd test
jj commit -m "my commit"
jj log -r @- -T commit_id # Save the id
jj abandon -r @-
jj edit <saved_id>
jj log -r :: # Does not show the currently editing commit
```
When loading repos on a server, there is no repo path. We currently
use a placeholder at Google. This patch will let us not do that.
I think we can remove the paths from `Workspace` too, but I'll leave
that for later, if at all.
`RepoLoader` can be used on a server. You would then call
`RepoLoader::new()`. Let's clarify what `init()` does by renaming it
and documenting it.
I think `WorkspaceLoader`, OTOH, is only useful for loading a
workspace from disk. I also documented that.
We had both `repo()` and `mut_repo()` on `Transaction` and I think it
was easy to get confused and think that the former returned a
`&ReadonlyRepo` but both of them actually return a reference to
`MutableRepo` (the latter obviously returns a mutable reference). I
hope that renaming to the more idiomatic `repo_mut()` will help
clarify.
We could instead have renamed them to `mut_repo()` and
`mut_repo_mut()` but that seemed unnecessarily long. It would better
match the `mut_repo` variables we typically use, though.
I'm thinking of adding an option to embed operation diffs in "op log", and
"op log" shouldn't fail at the root operation. Let's make "op diff"/"show"
also work for consistency.
This is closer to the original behavior before 5e8d7f8c "rewrite: update
references after rewriting all commits." References can move to divergent
commits, so they should propagate further if there are more rewrites. See
the inline comment for subtle behavior difference.
We could instead replay parent_mapping in topological order, but we would
still need to flatten abandon records.
"Concurrent" operations are not necessarily actually concurrent, so
"divergent" seems like a better name. And "reconcile" seems like a
better term for merging them, though we also sometimes use "merge".
If merge-heavy history was abandoned, intermediate parent chains can have tons
of duplicates, and the process explodes soon. Instead, we can skip any parent
ids that have been remapped.
We can no longer detect cycles reliably, but I think that's okay so long as
the function terminates.
Fixes#4352
The tree-level conflicts have worked well in practice and we don't
want to allow users to use legacy trees for new commits. We don't
really support legacy trees very well since 0590f8beceb8 anyway.
This enables the creation of Repo objects in environments without standard filesystem support, by allowing the caller to load the store objects however they see fit. This confines interaction with the filesystem to the WorkingCopy abstractions.
If readonly_index() and index() returned Result, it would propagate to many
call sites. That seems bad for API ergonomics. Suppose most "repo" commands
depend on an index, I think it's okay to load index eagerly:
- "jj config" doesn't load repo (nor index)
- "jj workspace root" doesn't load repo (nor index)
- some other mutation commands load index when printing commit summary
- many other commands load index when resolving revset
As the doc comment says, it's called only from CommitBuilder. Let's clarify
that. I'm also planning to extract a builder that only writes to the store
(without mutably borrowing a mut_repo.) It will help implement description
template.
Forgetting a workspace removes its working-copy commit, so it makes
sense for it to be abandoned if it is discardable just like editing a
new commit will cause the old commit to be abandoned if it is
discardable.
Currently, if two workspaces are editing the same discardable commit and
one of them switches to editing a different commit, it is abandoned even
though the other workspace is still editing it. This commit treats
workspaces as referencing their working-copy commits so that they won't
be abandoned.
Since we've split (local, remotes) branches to (locals, remotes { branches }),
.has_branch() API no longer makes much sense. Callers often need to check if
a remote branch is tracked.
I've wanted to make the Git support optional for a long time. However,
since everyone uses the Git backend (and we want to support it even in
the custom binary at Google), there hasn't been much practical reason
to make Git support optional.
Since we now use jj-lib on the server at Google, it does make sense to
have the server not include Git support. In addition to making the
server binary smaller, it would make it easier for us (jj team at
Googlle) to prove that our server is not affected by some libgit2 or
Gitoxide vulnerability. But to be honest, neither of those problems
have come up, so it's more of an excuse to make the Git support
optional at this point.
It turned out to be much simpler than I expected to make Git support
in the lib crate optional. We have done a pretty good job of keeping
Git-related logic separated there.
If we make Git support optional in the lib crate, it's going to make
it a bit harder to move logic from the CLI crate into the lib crate
(as we have planned to do). Maybe that's good, though, since it helps
remind us to keep Git-related logic separated.
It's been more than 6 months since we added support for dynamically
selecting the working copy implementation. This patch drops support
for selecting the default implementation of that and other stores.
Some backends, like the one we have at Google, can restrict access to
certain files. For such files, if they return a regular
`BackendError::ReadObject`, then that will terminate iteration in many
cases (e.g. when diffing or listing files). This patch adds a new
error variant for them to return instead, plus handling of such errors
in diff output and in the working copy.
In order to test the feature, I added a new commit backend that
returns the new `ReadAccessDenied` error when the caller tries to read
certain objects.
I recently needed to test something on top of a two branches at the
same time, so I created a new commit on top of both of them (i.e. a
merge commit). I then ran tests and made some adjustments to the
code. These adjustments belonged in one of the parent branches, so I
used `jj squash --into` to squash it in there. Unfortunately, that
meant that my working copy became a single-parent commit based on one
of the branches only. We already had #2859 for tracking this issue.
This patch changes the behavior so we create a new working-copy commit
with all of the previous parents.
When I addded the workaround in 256988de65de, I missed the comment
just below explaining that heads removed by the other side were
already handled. Since that's not handled when using non-default
indexes now, we need to handle it in an `else` block.
The function now returns an iterator over `Result`s, matching
`Operation::parents()`.
I updated callers to also propagate the error where it was trivial.
