It makes sense to omit either of the arguments of the `..` operator,
even though `..x` is equivalent to `:x`. `x..`, with a implied right
argument of `heads()` is more useful.
The recent e5dd93cbf712, whose description says "cleanup: make Vec
inside CommitId etc. non-public", made all ID types in the `backend`
module *except* for `CommitId` non-public :P This patch makes
With this change, you can do e.g. `heads(remote_branches())`. That
should currently be the same as `public_heads()`, except that we don't
yet remove public heads when remote branches have been updated. Having
this support should be generally useful, but I may use it in the short
term specifically for depending less on the public heads, until I get
around to keeping them up to date.
The removal of hidden heads was just there to help with the transition
away from evolution (#32). Now that we no longer depend on evolution
for removing old heads, we can remove the hack.
This rewrites the code for resolving a change id to simply walk the
entire index. That's obviously not optimal, but it's not worse than
what we did in the evolution-based resolution. This is yet another
step towards removing support for evolution (#32).
Now that we no longer have to be careful whether we mean "all heads"
or "non-obsolete heads", there's no need to pass them as
arguments. It's still possible to get a DAG range to a hidden commit
by using `RevsetExpression::dag_range_to()`, as long as the hidden
commit is indexed.
Now that we remove hidden heads whenever a transaction commits,
`non_obsolete_heads()` should always be the same as `all_heads()`,
except during a transaction. I don't think we depend on the difference
even during a transaction. Let's simplify a bit by removing the revset
function `all_heads()` and renaming `non_obsolete_heads()` to
`heads()`. This is part of issue #32.
This should be useful in lots of places. For example, `jj rebase -r`
currently rebases all descendants, because that's what the auto-evolve
feature does. I think it would be nice to instead copy from
Mercurial's `-s` flag for also rebasing descendants. Then `jj rebase
-r` can be made to pull a commit out of a stack, rebasing descendants
onto the rebased commit's parents. I also intend to use this
functionality for rebasing descendants when remote branches have been
rewritten.
This adds support for resolving tags and branches in revsets. Branches
and tags can be resolved by specifying their name (e.g. "main"). To
specify a branch's target on a remote, use e.g. "main@origin". In case
of conflicts, they get resolved to their "adds".
This adds support for having conflicting git refs in the view, but we
never create conflicts yet. The `git_refs()` revset includes all "add"
sides of any conflicts. Similarly `origin/main` (for example) resolves
to all "adds" if it's conflicted (meaning that `jj co origin/main` and
many other commands will error out if `origin/main` is
conflicted). The `git_refs` template renders the reference for all
"adds" and adds a "?" as suffix for conflicted refs.
The reason I'm adding this now is not because it's high priority on
its own (it's likely extremely uncommon to run two concurrent `jj git
refresh` and *also* update refs in the underlying git repo at the same
time) but because it's a building block for the branch support I've
planned (issue #21).
This patch makes it so we attempt to resolve a symbol as the
non-obsolete commits in a change id if all other resolutions
fail.
This addresses issue #15. I decided to not require any operator for
looking up by change id. I want to make it as easy as possible to use
change ids instead of commit ids to see how well it works to interact
mostly with change ids instead of commit ids (I'll try to test that by
using it myself).
I'd like to experiment with mostly using change ids instead of commit
ids on the CLI. Then it needs to be easy to refer to the non-obsolete
commits in a change, which means we probably don't want to require any
operators (i.e. a plain change id should resolve to the non-obsolete
commits in the change). This patch prepares for letting a change id
resolve to (possibly) many commits.
When rendering a non-contiguous subset of the commits, we want to
still show the connections between the commits in the graph, even
though they're not directly connected. This commit introduces an
adaptor for the revset iterators that also yield the edges to show in
such a simplified graph.
This has no measurable impact on `jj log -r ,,v2.0.0` in the git.git
repo.
The output of `jj log -r 'v1.0.0 | v2.0.0'` now looks like this:
```
o e156455ea491 e156455ea491 gitster@pobox.com 2014-05-28 11:04:19.000 -07:00 refs/tags/v2.0.0
:\ Git 2.0
: ~
o c2f3bf071ee9 c2f3bf071ee9 junkio@cox.net 2005-12-21 00:01:00.000 -08:00 refs/tags/v1.0.0
~ GIT 1.0.0
```
Before this commit, it looked like this:
```
o e156455ea491 e156455ea491 gitster@pobox.com 2014-05-28 11:04:19.000 -07:00 refs/tags/v2.0.0
| Git 2.0
| o c2f3bf071ee9 c2f3bf071ee9 junkio@cox.net 2005-12-21 00:01:00.000 -08:00 refs/tags/v1.0.0
| |\ GIT 1.0.0
```
The output of `jj log -r 'git_refs()'` in the git.git repo is still
completely useless (it's >350k lines and >500MB of data). I think
that's because we don't filter out edges to ancestors that we have
transitive edges to. Mercurial also doesn't filter out such edges, but
Git (with `--simplify-by-decoration`) seems to filter them out. I'll
change it soon so we filter them out.
This adds a `git_refs()` revset that includes all commits pointed to
by a git ref. It's not very useful yet because the graph log doesn't
use the right type of edges for non-contiguous commits.
This lets you use the same operator as we currently have for ancestors
and descendants (`,,`) to also specify a DAG range. That's what
Mercurial uses the `::` operator for and what Git has `git log
--ancestry-path` for.
It seems clearer to let the parsed `RevsetExpression`s have only root
and head expression instead of adding the ancestors when building the
expression tree.
I really liked the idea of having the operators for parents and
ancestors (etc.) look similar, but that turned out to be problematic
when we want to add an infix operator for a DAG range (hg's `::`
revset operator and git's `--ancestry-path` flag). Let's say we chose
`:*:` as the operator. Part of the problem is how to parse `foo:*:bar`
without eagerly parsing the `foo:`. It would also be nicer to use
exactly the same operator as prefix, postfix, and infix. Since the
"parents" operator can be repeated, we can't have it be just `:` and
the "ancestors" operator be `::`. We could make the "ancestors"
operator be something like `*:*` (or anything symmetric with the `:`
symbol on the inside). However, at that point, the operator is getting
ugly and hard to type. Another option would be to use `:` for
ancestors and `::` for parents, but that is counterintuitive and get
annoying if you want to repeat it. So it seems that the best option is
to simply pick different symbols for parents/children and
ancestors/descendants/range.
This patch changes the ancestors/descendants operators to both be
`,,`. I'm not at all attached to that particular symbol. I suspect
we'll change it later.
Now that expressions may contain literal strings, we can simply have
functions accept only expressions arguments. That simplifies both the
grammar and the code.
A small drawback is that `description((foo), bar)` is now allowed and
does a search for the string "foo" (not "(foo)"). That seems
unlikely to trip up users.
