With this change a warning is shown if the user does not explicitly specify the target revision, but the behavior is unchanged (it still defaults to the working copy).
In the future the warning will be turned into an error. In other words, it will be required to specify target revision.
The bulk of the changes here are to prepare tests for the upcoming change, to make the transition easier.
For additional details please see:
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/issues/5374
* https://github.com/jj-vcs/jj/discussions/5363
Given the previously‐stated intention of making this default
for the 0.27 release, prepare for that decision ahead of time by
enabling subprocessing by default on trunk. This will help surface
any regressions and workflow incompatibilities and therefore give
us more information to decide whether to keep or revert this commit,
without inconveniencing any users who haven’t already opted in to
the bleeding edge.
Please feel free to revert without hesitation if any major issues
arise; this is not intended as a strong commitment to enable this
option for the next stable release if it turns out to not be ready. In
that case, it’s better that we learn that early on in the cycle,
rather than having to revert at the last minute or, worse, cutting
a stable release that we later find contains a serious regression.
* Make the new `GitFetch` api public.
* Move `git::fetch` to `lib/tests/test_git.rs` as `git_fetch`, to minimize
churn in the tests. Update test call sites to use `git_fetch`
* Delete the `git::fetch` from `lib/src/git.rs`.
* Update `jj git clone` and `git_fetch` in `cli/src/git_utils.rs` to use
the new api directly. Removing one redundant layer of indirection.
* This fixes#4920 as it first fetches from all remotes before `import_refs()`
is called, so there is no race condition if the same commit is treated
differently in different remotes specified in the same command.
Original commit by @essiene
Currently, the Git subprocess tests only work on Linux due to a default
path being used for the `git` executable when `$PATH` is unset. This can
break if Git isn't installed at the expected path. Also, I believe it is
currently necessary to set the `$TEST_GIT_EXECUTABLE_PATH` environment
variable on Windows for tests to pass. Instead, we should use the user's
`$PATH` to locate the `git` executable, as well as any other executables
that are needed. This also makes `$TEST_GIT_EXECUTABLE_PATH` no longer
necessary, so it can be removed.
In some cases, there are non trivial codepaths for fetching multiple
branches explicitly. In particular, it might be the case that fetching
works for n = 2 but not n = 3.
This commit changes a cli test to have 3 remotes and 3 branches, and a
lib test with 3 branches, only one of them succeds.
The working-copy revision is usually the latest commit, but it's not always
true. This patch ensures that the wc branch is emitted first so the graph node
order is less dependent on rewrites.
We had documented that we support `git.auto-local-bookmark` but we
don't. The documentation has been incorrect since d9c68e08b1a5. This
patch fixes it by adding support for `git.auto-local-bookmark` with
fallback to the old/current `git.auto-local-branch`.
.
Added colons to make it seem less like an English sentence, see
https://github.com/martinvonz/jj/pull/4602#discussion_r1791295776
I believe printing both the start and end times is excessive for a
summary. For now, I have it print just the start time for consistency.
I intend to change it to print the ending time later.
I was a bit torn on whether to use `format_timestamp(self.time().start())`
or `self.time().start().ago()`. The latter looks better, but is less
configurable and worse for dates long ago. In the future, we could add a
`format_op_summary_timestamp` function and/or a template function that
uses `.ago()` for recent dates and absolute dates for old dates.
This removes an invalid View state from the root operation.
Note that the root index will have to be reindexed in order to resolve "root()"
in the root operation. I don't think this would practically matter, so this
patch doesn't bump the index version to invalidate the existing indexes.
See also 48a9f9ef56c1 "repo: use Transaction for creating repo-init operation."
* First fetch from remote.
* Then check tx.{base_repo(),repo}.view().remote_bookmarks_matching(<branch>, <remote>).
This has to happen after the fetch has been done so the tx.repo() is updated.
* Warn if a branch is not found in any of the remotes used in the fetch. Note that the remotes
used in the fetch can be a subset of the remotes configured for the repo, so the language
of the warning tries to point that out.
Fixes: #4293
Jujutsu's branches do not behave like Git branches, which is a major
hurdle for people adopting it from Git. They rather behave like
Mercurial's (hg) bookmarks.
We've had multiple discussions about it in the last ~1.5 years about this rename in the Discord,
where multiple people agreed that this _false_ familiarity does not help anyone. Initially we were
reluctant to do it but overtime, more and more users agreed that `bookmark` was a better for name
the current mechanism. This may be hard break for current `jj branch` users, but it will immensly
help Jujutsu's future, by defining it as our first own term. The `[experimental-moving-branches]`
config option is currently left alone, to force not another large config update for
users, since the last time this happened was when `jj log -T show` was removed, which immediately
resulted in breaking users and introduced soft deprecations.
This name change will also make it easier to introduce Topics (#3402) as _topological branches_
with a easier model.
This was mostly done via LSP, ripgrep and sed and a whole bunch of manual changes either from
me being lazy or thankfully pointed out by reviewers.
It's inconsistent that some warnings have headings and some don't, and it seems
the choice is arbitrary. Let's unify the style. There are two exceptions:
1. continued line following labeled message,
2. "unrecognized response" followed by prompt.
this greatly speeds up the time to run all tests, at the cost of slightly larger recompile times for individual tests.
this unfortunately adds the requirement that all tests are listed in `runner.rs` for the crate.
to avoid forgetting, i've added a new test that ensures the directory is in sync with the file.
## benchmarks
before this change, recompiling all tests took 32-50 seconds and running a single test took 3.5 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 3.543 s ± 0.168 s [User: 2.597 s, System: 1.262 s]
Range (min … max): 3.400 s … 3.847 s 10 runs
```
after this change, recompiling all tests take 4 seconds:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs ; cargo t --test runner --no-run'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.055 s ± 0.123 s [User: 3.591 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.804 s … 4.159 s 10 runs
```
and running a single test takes about the same:
```
; hyperfine 'touch lib/src/lib.rs && cargo t --test runner -- test_working_copy'
Time (mean ± σ): 4.129 s ± 0.120 s [User: 3.636 s, System: 1.593 s]
Range (min … max): 3.933 s … 4.346 s 10 runs
```
about 1.4 seconds of that is the time for the runner, of which .4 is the time for the linker. so
there may be room for further improving the times.
As far as I can see in the chat, there's no objection to changing the default,
and git.auto-local-branch = false is generally preferred.
docs/branches.md isn't updated as it would otherwise conflict with #2625. I
think the "Remotes" section will need a non-trivial rewrite.
#1136, #1862
This will be the option to include non-tracking remote branches. We could add
more fine-grained filtering flags, but I think --all is good enough and easier
to remember.
This patch also updates many of the test outputs to include synchronized remote
branches. I think verbose outputs will help catch future bugs.
I'm not sure if this is the best way to render non-tracking branches, but
it helps to write CLI tests. Maybe we can add some hint or decoration to
non-tracking branches, but I'd like to avoid bikeshedding at this point.
Since we haven't migrated the push function yet, a deleted branch can be
pushed to non-tracking remotes. This will be addressed later.
#1136
Apparently, it gets too verbose if the remote history is actively rewritten.
Let's summarize the output for now. The plan is to show the list of moved refs
instead of the full list of abandoned commits.
The problem is that the first non-working-copy commit moves the unborn current
branch to that commit, but jj doesn't "export" the moved branch. Therefore,
the next jj invocation notices the "external" ref change, which was actually
made by jj.
I'm not sure why we play nice by setting the "current" HEAD, but I *think* it's
okay to set the "new" HEAD and reset to the same commit to clear Git index.
This will probably help to understand why you've got conflicts after fetching.
Maybe we can also report changed local refs.
I think the stats should be redirected to stderr, but we have many other similar
messages printed to stdout. I'll probably fix them all at once later.
This adds a new `revset-aliases.immutable_heads()s` config for
defining the set of immutable commits. The set is defined as the
configured revset, as well as its ancestors, and the root commit
commit (even if the configured set is empty).
This patch also adds enforcement of the config where we already had
checks preventing rewrite of the root commit. The working-copy commit
is implicitly assumed to be writable in most cases. Specifically, we
won't prevent amending the working copy even if the user includes it
in the config but we do prevent `jj edit @` in that case. That seems
good enough to me. Maybe we should emit a warning when the working
copy is in the set of immutable commits.
Maybe we should add support for something more like [Mercurial's
phases](https://wiki.mercurial-scm.org/Phases), which is propagated on
push and pull. There's already some affordance for that in the view
object's `public_heads` field. However, this is simpler, especially
since we can't propagate the phase to Git remotes, and seems like a
good start. Also, it lets you say that commits authored by other users
are immutable, for example.
For now, the functionality is in the CLI library. I'm not sure if we
want to move it into the library crate. I'm leaning towards letting
library users do whatever they want without being restricted by
immutable commits. I do think we should move the functionality into a
future `ui-lib` or `ui-util` crate. That crate would have most of the
functionality in the current `cli_util` module (but in a
non-CLI-specific form).
I made it simply fail on explicit fetch/import, and ignored on implicit import.
Since the error mode is predictable and less likely to occur. I don't think it
makes sense to implement warning propagation just for this.
Closes#1690.
