5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Darren Schroeder
2ad68e3702
cleanup coreutils tagging (#12286)
# Description

Cleanup search terms and help usage to be consistent and include
coreutils so people can easily find out which commands are coreutils.


![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/343840/09b03b11-19ce-49ec-b0b5-9b8455d1b676)

or
```nushell
help commands | where usage =~ coreutils | reject params input_output
```

# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
2024-03-25 17:13:46 -05:00
Artemiy
1867bb1a88
Fix incorrect handling of boolean flags for builtin commands (#11492)
# Description
Possible fix of #11456
This PR fixes a bug where builtin commands did not respect the logic of
dynamically passed boolean flags. The reason is
[has_flag](6f59abaf43/crates/nu-protocol/src/ast/call.rs (L204C5-L212C6))
method did not evaluate and take into consideration expression used with
flag.

To address this issue a solution is proposed:
1. `has_flag` method is moved to `CallExt` and new logic to evaluate
expression and check if it is a boolean value is added
2. `has_flag_const` method is added to `CallExt` which is a constant
version of `has_flag`
3. `has_named` method is added to `Call` which is basically the old
logic of `has_flag`
4. All usages of `has_flag` in code are updated, mostly to pass
`engine_state` and `stack` to new `has_flag`. In `run_const` commands it
is replaced with `has_flag_const`. And in a few select places: parser,
`to nuon` and `into string` old logic via `has_named` is used.

# User-Facing Changes
Explicit values of boolean flags are now respected in builtin commands.
Before:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/f9fbabb2-3cfd-43f9-ba9e-ece76d80043c)
After:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/21867596-2075-437f-9c85-45563ac70083)

Another example:
Before:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/efdbc5ca-5227-45a4-ac5b-532cdc2bbf5f)
After:

![image](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/assets/17511668/2907d5c5-aa93-404d-af1c-21cdc3d44646)


# Tests + Formatting
Added test reproducing some variants of original issue.
2024-01-11 17:19:48 +02:00
Eric Hodel
a95a4505ef
Convert Shellerror::GenericError to named fields (#11230)
# Description

Replace `.to_string()` used in `GenericError` with `.into()` as
`.into()` seems more popular

Replace `Vec::new()` used in `GenericError` with `vec![]` as `vec![]`
seems more popular

(There are so, so many)
2023-12-07 00:40:03 +01:00
Eric Hodel
8386bc0919
Convert more ShellError variants to named fields (#11173)
# Description

Convert these ShellError variants to named fields:
* CreateNotPossible
* MoveNotPossibleSingle
* DirectoryNotFoundCustom
* DirectoryNotFound
* NotADirectory
* OutOfMemoryError
* PermissionDeniedError
* IOErrorSpanned
* IOError
* IOInterrupted

Also place the `span` field of `DirectoryNotFound` last to match other
errors.

Part of #10700 (almost half done!)

# User-Facing Changes

None

# Tests + Formatting

- 🟢 `toolkit fmt`
- 🟢 `toolkit clippy`
- 🟢 `toolkit test`
- 🟢 `toolkit test stdlib`

# After Submitting

N/A
2023-11-28 06:43:51 -06:00
Taylor
494a5a5286
Add mktemp command (#11005)
closes #10845 

I've opened this a little prematurely to get some questions answered
before I cleanup the code.

As I started trying to better understand GNUs `mktemp` I've realized its
kind of peculiar and we might want to change its behavior to introduce
it to nushell.

#### quiet and dry run

Does it make sense to keep the `quiet` and `dry_run` flags? I don't
think so. The GNU documentation says this about the dry run flag "Using
the output of this command to create a new file is inherently unsafe, as
there is a window of time between generating the name and using it where
another process can create an object by the same name." So yeah why keep
it? As far as quiet goes, does it make sense to silence the errors in
nushell?

#### other confusing flags

According to the [gnu
docs](https://www.gnu.org/software/coreutils/manual/html_node/mktemp-invocation.html),
the `-t` flag is deprecated and the `-p`/ `--tempdir` are the same flag
with the only difference being `--tempdir` takes an optional path, Given
that, I've broken the `-p` away from `--tempdir`. Now there is one
switch `--tmpdir`/`-t` and one named param `--tmpdir-path`/`-p`.

GNU mktemp
```
  -p DIR, --tmpdir[=DIR]  interpret TEMPLATE relative to DIR; if DIR is not
                        specified, use $TMPDIR if set, else /tmp.  With
                        this option, TEMPLATE must not be an absolute name;
                        unlike with -t, TEMPLATE may contain slashes, but
                        mktemp creates only the final component
  -t                  interpret TEMPLATE as a single file name component,
                        relative to a directory: $TMPDIR, if set; else the
                        directory specified via -p; else /tmp [deprecated]

```
to
nushell mktemp
```
  -p, --tmpdir-path <Filepath> # named param, must provide a path
  -t, --tmpdir                 # a switch
```

Is this a terrible idea?

What should I do?

---------

Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
2023-11-17 19:30:53 -06:00