<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
This PR seeks to generalize the `seq date` command so that it can
receive any duration as an `--increment`. Whereas the current command
can only output a list of dates spaced at least 1 day apart, the new
command can output a list of datetimes that are spaced apart by any
duration.
For example:
```
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 6hr --output-format "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"
╭───┬─────────────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 00:00:00 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-01 06:00:00 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-01 12:00:00 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-01 18:00:00 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-02 00:00:00 │
╰───┴─────────────────────╯
```
Note that the default behavior remains unchanged:
```
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```
The default output format also remains unchanged:
```
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 6hr
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-02 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
## Breaking Changes
* The `--increment` argument no longer accepts just an integer and
requires a duration
```
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 1
Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch
× Parse mismatch during operation.
╭─[entry #13:1:68]
1 │ seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 1
· ┬
· ╰── expected duration with valid units
╰────
```
EDIT: Break Change is mitigated. `--increment` accepts either an integer
or duration.
## Bug Fix
* The `--days` argument had an off-by-one error and would print 1 too
many elements in the output. For example,
```
# OLD BEHAVIOR
> seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --increment 1
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │
│ 5 │ 2025-01-06 │ <-- Extra element
╰───┴────────────╯
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --increment 1day
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```
## New Argument
* A `--periods` argument is introduced to indicate the number of output
elements, regardless of the `--increment` value. Importantly, the
`--days` argument is ignored when `--periods` is set.
```
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --periods 10 --increment 1day
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │
│ 5 │ 2025-01-06 │
│ 6 │ 2025-01-07 │
│ 7 │ 2025-01-08 │
│ 8 │ 2025-01-09 │
│ 9 │ 2025-01-10 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```
Note that the `--days` and `--periods` arguments differ in their
functions. The `--periods` value determines the number of elements in
the output that are always spaced `--increment` apart. The `--days`
value determines the bookends `--begin-date` and `--end-date` when only
one is set, though the number of elements may differ based on the
`--increment` value.
```
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date -e 2025-01-01 --days 2 --increment 5hr --output-format "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"
╭───┬─────────────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-23 22:25:05 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-24 03:25:05 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-24 08:25:05 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-24 13:25:05 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-24 18:25:05 │
╰───┴─────────────────────╯
```
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
I added several examples for each user-facing change in
`generators/seq_date.rs` and some tests in `tests/commands/seq_date.rs`.
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Turns out there are duplicate conversion functions: `as_i64` and
`as_f64`. In most cases, these can be replaced with `as_int` and
`as_float`, respectively.
# Description
The meaning of the word usage is specific to describing how a command
function is *used* and not a synonym for general description. Usage can
be used to describe the SYNOPSIS or EXAMPLES sections of a man page
where the permitted argument combinations are shown or example *uses*
are given.
Let's not confuse people and call it what it is a description.
Our `help` command already creates its own *Usage* section based on the
available arguments and doesn't refer to the description with usage.
# User-Facing Changes
`help commands` and `scope commands` will now use `description` or
`extra_description`
`usage`-> `description`
`extra_usage` -> `extra_description`
Breaking change in the plugin protocol:
In the signature record communicated with the engine.
`usage`-> `description`
`extra_usage` -> `extra_description`
The same rename also takes place for the methods on
`SimplePluginCommand` and `PluginCommand`
# Tests + Formatting
- Updated plugin protocol specific changes
# After Submitting
- [ ] update plugin protocol doc
# Description
The previous messages said that the command printed dates separated by
newlines. But the current iteration of `seq date` returns a list.
# User-Facing Changes
Minor wording edit.
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
# Description
When implementing a `Command`, one must also import all the types
present in the function signatures for `Command`. This makes it so that
we often import the same set of types in each command implementation
file. E.g., something like this:
```rust
use nu_protocol::ast::Call;
use nu_protocol::engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack};
use nu_protocol::{
record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, PipelineData,
ShellError, Signature, Span, Type, Value,
};
```
This PR adds the `nu_engine::command_prelude` module which contains the
necessary and commonly used types to implement a `Command`:
```rust
// command_prelude.rs
pub use crate::CallExt;
pub use nu_protocol::{
ast::{Call, CellPath},
engine::{Command, EngineState, Stack},
record, Category, Example, IntoInterruptiblePipelineData, IntoPipelineData, IntoSpanned,
PipelineData, Record, ShellError, Signature, Span, Spanned, SyntaxShape, Type, Value,
};
```
This should reduce the boilerplate needed to implement a command and
also gives us a place to track the breadth of the `Command` API. I tried
to be conservative with what went into the prelude modules, since it
might be hard/annoying to remove items from the prelude in the future.
Let me know if something should be included or excluded.
# Description
This PR renames the conversion functions on `Value` to be more consistent.
It follows the Rust [API guidelines](https://rust-lang.github.io/api-guidelines/naming.html#ad-hoc-conversions-follow-as_-to_-into_-conventions-c-conv) for ad-hoc conversions.
The conversion functions on `Value` now come in a few forms:
- `coerce_{type}` takes a `&Value` and attempts to convert the value to
`type` (e.g., `i64` are converted to `f64`). This is the old behavior of
some of the `as_{type}` functions -- these functions have simply been
renamed to better reflect what they do.
- The new `as_{type}` functions take a `&Value` and returns an `Ok`
result only if the value is of `type` (no conversion is attempted). The
returned value will be borrowed if `type` is non-`Copy`, otherwise an
owned value is returned.
- `into_{type}` exists for non-`Copy` types, but otherwise does not
attempt conversion just like `as_type`. It takes an owned `Value` and
always returns an owned result.
- `coerce_into_{type}` has the same relationship with `coerce_{type}` as
`into_{type}` does with `as_{type}`.
- `to_{kind}_string`: conversion to different string formats (debug,
abbreviated, etc.). Only two of the old string conversion functions were
removed, the rest have been renamed only.
- `to_{type}`: other conversion functions. Currently, only `to_path`
exists. (And `to_string` through `Display`.)
This table summaries the above:
| Form | Cost | Input Ownership | Output Ownership | Converts `Value`
case/`type` |
| ---------------------------- | ----- | --------------- |
---------------- | -------- |
| `as_{type}` | Cheap | Borrowed | Borrowed/Owned | No |
| `into_{type}` | Cheap | Owned | Owned | No |
| `coerce_{type}` | Cheap | Borrowed | Borrowed/Owned | Yes |
| `coerce_into_{type}` | Cheap | Owned | Owned | Yes |
| `to_{kind}_string` | Expensive | Borrowed | Owned | Yes |
| `to_{type}` | Expensive | Borrowed | Owned | Yes |
# User-Facing Changes
Breaking API change for `Value` in `nu-protocol` which is exposed as
part of the plugin API.
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx
you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->
# Description
Fix#11732
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.
Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
Invalid output format causes an error, not a panic.
```nu
❯ seq date --output-format '%H-%M-%S'
Error: × Invalid output format
╭─[entry #1:1:1]
1 │ seq date --output-format '%H-%M-%S'
· ────┬───
· ╰── an error occurred when formatting an argument
╰────
```
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Replace `.to_string()` used in `GenericError` with `.into()` as
`.into()` seems more popular
Replace `Vec::new()` used in `GenericError` with `vec![]` as `vec![]`
seems more popular
(There are so, so many)
# Description
When referring to the type use `int` consistently. Only when referring
to the concept of integer numbers use `integer`.
- Fix `random integer` to `random int` tests
- Forgot in #10520
- Use int instead of integer in error messages
- Use int type name in bits commands
- Fix messages in `for` examples
- Use int typename in `into` commands
- Use int typename in rest of commands
- Report errors in `nu-protocol` with int typename
Work for #10332
# User-Facing Changes
User errorrs should now use `int` so you can easily find the necessary
commands or type annotations.
# Tests + Formatting
Only two tests found that needed updating
# Description
As part of the refactor to split spans off of Value, this moves to using
helper functions to create values, and using `.span()` instead of
matching span out of Value directly.
Hoping to get a few more helping hands to finish this, as there are a
lot of commands to update :)
# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: WindSoilder <windsoilder@outlook.com>
# Description
This doesn't really do much that the user could see, but it helps get us
ready to do the steps of the refactor to split the span off of Value, so
that values can be spanless. This allows us to have top-level values
that can hold both a Value and a Span, without requiring that all values
have them.
We expect to see significant memory reduction by removing so many
unnecessary spans from values. For example, a table of 100,000 rows and
5 columns would have a savings of ~8megs in just spans that are almost
always duplicated.
# User-Facing Changes
Nothing yet
# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect -A clippy::result_large_err` to check that
you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library
> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->
# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
# Description
Working on uniformizing the ending messages regarding methods usage()
and extra_usage(). This is related to the issue
https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/5066 after discussing it with
@jntrnr
# User-Facing Changes
None.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
_(Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.)_
I opened this PR to unify the run command method. It's mainly to improve
consistency across the tree.
# User-Facing Changes
None.
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
# Description
Inspired by #7592
For brevity use `Value::test_{string,int,float,bool}`
Includes fixes to commands that were abusing `Span::test_data` in their
implementation. Now the call span is used where possible or the explicit
`Span::unknonw` is used.
## Command fixes
- Fix abuse of `Span::test_data()` in `query_xml`
- Fix abuse of `Span::test_data()` in `term size`
- Fix abuse of `Span::test_data()` in `seq date`
- Fix two abuses of `Span::test_data` in `nu-cli`
- Change `Span::test_data` to `Span::unknown` in `keybindings listen`
- Add proper call span to `registry query`
- Fix span use in `nu_plugin_query`
- Fix span assignment in `select`
- Use `Span::unknown` instead of `test_data` in more places
## Other
- Use `Value::test_int`/`test_float()` consistently
- More `test_string` and `test_bool`
- Fix unused imports
# User-Facing Changes
Some commands may now provide more helpful spans for downstream use in
errors
# Description
When `seq date` was changed to remove the `-s` param, the example was
missed. This PR removes that example.
# User-Facing Changes
# Tests + Formatting
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used -A
clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're using the standard code
style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
chrono version update
# Description
upgrade chrono to 0.4.23
# Major Changes
If you're considering making any major change to nushell, before
starting work on it, seek feedback from regular contributors and get
approval for the idea from the core team either on
[Discord](https://discordapp.com/invite/NtAbbGn) or [GitHub
issue](https://github.com/nushell/nushell/issues/new/choose).
Making sure we're all on board with the change saves everybody's time.
Thanks!
# Tests + Formatting
Make sure you've done the following, if applicable:
- Add tests that cover your changes (either in the command examples, the
crate/tests folder, or in the /tests folder)
- Try to think about corner cases and various ways how your changes
could break. Cover those in the tests
Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:
- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace --features=extra -- -D warnings -D
clippy::unwrap_used -A clippy::needless_collect` to check that you're
using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace --features=extra` to check that all tests pass
# After Submitting
* Help us keep the docs up to date: If your PR affects the user
experience of Nushell (adding/removing a command, changing an
input/output type, etc.), make sure the changes are reflected in the
documentation (https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged.
Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add failing test that list of ints and floats is List<Number>
* Start defining subtype relation
* Make it possible to declare input and output types for commands
- Enforce them in tests
* Declare input and output types of commands
* Add formatted signatures to `help commands` table
* Revert SyntaxShape::Table -> Type::Table change
* Revert unnecessary derive(Hash) on SyntaxShape
Co-authored-by: JT <547158+jntrnr@users.noreply.github.com>
