Devyn Cairns 01d30a416b
Change PluginCommand API to be more like Command (#12279)
# Description

This is something that was discussed in the core team meeting last
Wednesday. @ayax79 is building `nu-plugin-polars` with all of the
dataframe commands into a plugin, and there are a lot of them, so it
would help to make the API more similar. At the same time, I think the
`Command` API is just better anyway. I don't think the difference is
justified, and the types for core commands have the benefit of requiring
less `.into()` because they often don't own their data

- Broke `signature()` up into `name()`, `usage()`, `extra_usage()`,
`search_terms()`, `examples()`
- `signature()` returns `nu_protocol::Signature`
- `examples()` returns `Vec<nu_protocol::Example>`
- `PluginSignature` and `PluginExample` no longer need to be used by
plugin developers

# User-Facing Changes
Breaking API for plugins yet again 😄
2024-03-27 11:59:57 +01:00

55 lines
1.7 KiB
Rust

use nu_plugin::{EngineInterface, EvaluatedCall, SimplePluginCommand};
use nu_protocol::{record, Category, LabeledError, Signature, SyntaxShape, Value};
use crate::ExamplePlugin;
pub struct Two;
impl SimplePluginCommand for Two {
type Plugin = ExamplePlugin;
fn name(&self) -> &str {
"example two"
}
fn usage(&self) -> &str {
"Plugin test example 2. Returns list of records"
}
fn signature(&self) -> Signature {
// The signature defines the usage of the command inside Nu, and also automatically
// generates its help page.
Signature::build(self.name())
.required("a", SyntaxShape::Int, "required integer value")
.required("b", SyntaxShape::String, "required string value")
.switch("flag", "a flag for the signature", Some('f'))
.optional("opt", SyntaxShape::Int, "Optional number")
.named("named", SyntaxShape::String, "named string", Some('n'))
.rest("rest", SyntaxShape::String, "rest value string")
.category(Category::Experimental)
}
fn run(
&self,
plugin: &ExamplePlugin,
_engine: &EngineInterface,
call: &EvaluatedCall,
input: &Value,
) -> Result<Value, LabeledError> {
plugin.print_values(2, call, input)?;
let vals = (0..10i64)
.map(|i| {
let record = record! {
"one" => Value::int(i, call.head),
"two" => Value::int(2 * i, call.head),
"three" => Value::int(3 * i, call.head),
};
Value::record(record, call.head)
})
.collect();
Ok(Value::list(vals, call.head))
}
}