MOVXload and MOVXstore opcodes have both an auxint offset
and an aux offset (a symbol name, like a local or arg or global).
Make sure we keep those values during rewrites.
Change-Id: Ic9fd61bf295b5d1457784c281079a4fb38f7ad3b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13849
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Implement index check panics (and slice check panics, for when
we need those).
Clean up nil check. Now that the new regalloc is in we can use
the register we just tested as the address 0 destination.
Remove jumps after panic calls, they are unreachable.
Change-Id: Ifee6e510cdea49cc7c7056887e4f06c67488d491
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13687
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Adds support for high multiply which is used by the frontend when
rewriting const division. The frontend currently only does this for 8,
16, and 32 bit integer arithmetic.
Change-Id: I9b6c6018f3be827a50ee6c185454ebc79b3094c8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13696
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Added F32 and F64 load, store, and addition.
Added F32 and F64 multiply.
Added F32 and F64 subtraction and division.
Added X15 to "clobber" for FP sub/div
Added FP constants
Added separate FP test in gc/testdata
Change-Id: Ifa60dbad948a40011b478d9605862c4b0cc9134c
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13612
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Using the type of the store argument is not safe, it may change
during rewriting, giving us the wrong store width.
(Store ptr (Trunc32to16 val) mem)
This should be a 2-byte store. But we have the rule:
(Trunc32to16 x) -> x
So if the Trunc rewrite happens before the Store -> MOVW rewrite,
then the Store thinks that the value it is storing is 4 bytes
in size and uses a MOVL. Bad things ensue.
Fix this by encoding the store width explicitly in the auxint field.
In general, we can't rely on the type of arguments, as they may
change during rewrites. The type of the op itself (as used by
the Load rules) is still ok to use.
Change-Id: I9e2359e4f657bb0ea0e40038969628bf0f84e584
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13636
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Mul8 is lowered to MULW, but the rules for constant
folding do not handle the fact that the operands
are int8.
Change-Id: I2c336686d86249393a8079a471c6ff74e6228f3d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13642
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Generating logging code every time causes large
diffs for small changes.
Since the intent is to use this for debugging only,
generate logging code only when requested.
Committed generated code will be logging free.
Change-Id: I9ef9e29c88b76c2557bad4c6b424b9db1255ec8b
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13623
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This makes it easier to investigate and
understand rewrite behavior.
Change-Id: I790e8964922caf98362ce8a6d6972f52d83eefa8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13588
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Introduce pseudo-ops PanicMem and LoweredPanicMem.
PanicMem could be rewritten directly into MOVL
during lowering, but then we couldn't log nil checks.
With this change, runnable nil check tests pass:
GOSSAPKG=main go run run.go -- nil*.go
Compiler output nil check tests fail:
GOSSAPKG=p go run run.go -- nil*.go
This is due to several factors:
* SSA has improved elimination of unnecessary nil checks.
* SSA is missing elimination of implicit nil checks.
* SSA is missing extra logging about why nil checks were removed.
I'm not sure how best to resolve these failures,
particularly in a world in which the two backends
will live side by side for some time.
For now, punt on the problem.
Change-Id: Ib2ca6824551671f92e0e1800b036f5ca0905e2a3
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13474
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Hardcoded the limit on constants only allowed.
Change-Id: Idb9b07b4871db7a752a79e492671e9b41207b956
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13257
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Rather than require an explicit Copy on the RHS of rewrite rules,
use rulegen magic to add it.
The advantages to handling this in rulegen are:
* simpler rules
* harder to accidentally miss a Copy
Change-Id: I46853bade83bdf517eee9495bf5a553175277b53
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13242
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The lowering rules were missing the non-64 bit case.
SBBLcarrymask can be folded to a int32 integer whose
type has a smaller bit size. Without the new AND rules
the following would be generated:
v19 = MOVLconst <uint8> [-1] : SI
v20 = ANDB <uint8> v18 v19 : DI
which is obviously a NOP.
Fixes#12022
Change-Id: I5f4209f78edc0f118e5b9b2908739f09cefebca4
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13301
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Implement ITAB, selecting the itable field of an interface.
Soften the lowering check to allow lowerings that leave
generic but dead ops behind. (The ITAB lowering does this.)
Change-Id: Icc84961dd4060d143602f001311aa1d8be0d7fc0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13144
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Don't put them in the control value's block.
That may be many blocks up the dominator tree.
Change-Id: Iab3ea36a890ffe0e355dadec7aeb676901c4f070
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/13134
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The only types that remain in the ssa package
are special compiler-only types.
Change-Id: If957abf128ec0778910d67666c297f97f183b7ee
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12933
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
The existing backend simply elides OCONVNOP.
There's no reason for us to do any differently.
Rather than insert ConvNops and then rewrite them
away, stop creating them in the first place.
Change-Id: I4bcbe2229fcebd189ae18df24f2c612feb6e215e
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12810
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Convert shift ops to also encode the size of the shift amount.
Change signed right shift from using CMOV to using bit twiddles.
It is a little bit better (5 instructions instead of 4, but fewer
bytes and slightly faster code). It's also a bit faster than
the 4-instruction branch version, even with a very predictable
branch. As tested on my machine, YMMV.
Implement OCOM while we are here.
Change-Id: I8ca12dd62fae5d626dc0e6da5d4bbd34fd9640d2
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12867
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Lots and lots of ops!
Also XOR for good measure.
Add a pass to the compiler generator to check that all of the
architecture-specific opcodes are handled by genValue. We will
catch any missing ones if we come across them during compilation,
but probably better to catch them statically.
Change-Id: Ic4adfbec55c8257f88117bc732fa664486262868
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12813
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
From compiling go there were 761 functions where OR was needed.
Change-Id: Ied8bf59cec50a3175273387bc7416bd042def6d8
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12766
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
For integer types less than a machine register, we have to decide
what the invariants are for the high bits of the register. We used
to set the high bits to the correct extension (sign or zero, as
determined by the type) of the low bits.
This CL makes the compiler ignore the high bits of the register
altogether (they are junk).
On this plus side, this means ops that generate subword results don't
have to worry about correctly extending them. On the minus side,
ops that consume subword arguments have to deal with the input
registers not being correctly extended.
For x86, this tradeoff is probably worth it. Almost all opcodes
have versions that use only the correct subword piece of their
inputs. (The one big exception is array indexing.) Not many opcodes
can correctly sign extend on output.
For other architectures, the tradeoff is probably not so clear, as
they don't have many subword-safe opcodes (e.g. 16-bit compare,
ignoring the high 16/48 bits). Fortunately we can decide whether
we do this per-architecture.
For the machine-independent opcodes, we pretend that the "register"
size is equal to the type width, so sign extension is immaterial.
Opcodes that care about the signedness of the input (e.g. compare,
right shift) have two different variants.
Change-Id: I465484c5734545ee697afe83bc8bf4b53bd9df8d
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12600
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
The only slice/interface comparisons that reach
the backend are comparisons to nil.
Funcs, maps, and channels are references types,
so pointer equality is enough.
Change-Id: I60a71da46a36202e9bd62ed370ab7d7f2e2800e7
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12715
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Before this patch there was only partial support for ANDQconst
which was not lowered. This patch added support for AND operations
for all bit sizes and signs.
Change-Id: I3a6b2cddfac5361b27e85fcd97f7f3537ebfbcb6
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12761
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Fix an issue where doasm fails if trying to multiply by a larger
than 32 bit const (doasm: notfound ft=9 tt=14 00008 IMULQ
$34359738369, CX 9 14). Fix truncation of 64 to 32 bit integer
when generating LEA causing incorrect values to be computed.
Change-Id: I1e65b63cc32ac673a9bb5a297b578b44c2f1ac8f
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12678
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Use width-and-signed-specific multiply opcodes.
Implement OMUL.
A few other cleanups.
Fixes#11467
Change-Id: Ib0fe80a1a9b7208dbb8a2b6b652a478847f5d244
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12540
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Handle multiplication with -1, 0, 3, 5, 9 and all powers of two.
Change-Id: I8e87e7670dae389aebf6f446d7a56950cacb59e0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12350
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
Bake the bit width and signedness into opcodes.
Pro: Rewrite rules become easier. Less chance for confusion.
Con: Lots more opcodes.
Let me know what you think. I'm leaning towards this, but I could be
convinced otherwise if people think this is too ugly.
Update #11467
Change-Id: Icf1b894268cdf73515877bb123839800d97b9df9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12362
Reviewed-by: Alan Donovan <adonovan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Keep track of the outargs size needed at each call.
Compute the size of the outargs section of the stack frame. It's just
the max of the outargs size at all the callsites in the function.
Change-Id: I3d0640f654f01307633b1a5f75bab16e211ea6c0
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12178
Reviewed-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josharian@gmail.com>
Joint hacking with josharian. Hints from matloob and Todd Neal.
Now with tests, and OROR.
Change-Id: Iff8826fde475691fb72a3eea7396a640b6274af9
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/12041
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
This will make it possible for us to start implementing interfaces
and other stack allocated types which are more than one machine word.
Change-Id: I52b187a791cf1919cb70ed6dabdc9f57b317ea83
Reviewed-on: https://go-review.googlesource.com/11631
Reviewed-by: Keith Randall <khr@golang.org>
